• Knowledge must be democratic, but who reads that? Is not likely to switch from an attempt to unify knowledge-based society to an approval-in which those who have the economic monopoly, for example, dominates on the other
• The knowledge society is based on science but you can do science at all, common sense should guide us .. but how can there be a universal common sense?
• The objective is to create unity from diversity, do not think it is right to maintain this diversity? I fear that he wanted to create a knowledge society is a bit 'utopia might be better to think before that a knowledge society with a better knowledge of the channel. That is if it is a knowledge society, the first thing you think is in my opinion to give everyone the same possibilities of knowledge, the same opportunities for learning, there must be an "extra-channel" that move across the face knowledge, without posing problems of economic and political interests. Let us ask ourselves: how to create this extra-channel?
Taking a cue from the Italian case I would say, for example, that there should be a journal open to all (other than Focus, which is not science, a middle ground between the two). I know that other countries in this middle ground exists, but the point is right here: In all countries there must be this opportunity, what do you think? Do you have other ideas to solve this problem?
• You can not think of all suddenly become experts in science, perhaps because not all interested, do not believe that knowledge flows should be a basic understanding first of all?
• In recent months we have talked a lot of curiosity, one of the suggestions could be to stimulate the curiosity of young people to know so that we can bring to it spontaneously without being forced. Must therefore create the conditions for which there is the individual participation of individuals.
• make clear to citizens of the knowledge that this type of company is a winner. Science has made great strides to make the man, the future lies in science. Everyone should be aware. We must raise awareness of European citizens.
• The information must be understandable to all. I think most people today "fear" science, not to be avoided for fear of height, not so much for lack of interest
• Information must be quick and from a single channel, this would avoid the disclosure of false information
• Interdisciplinarity of the scientific community, there must be dialogue between the parties
• Each country should produce and receive knowledge. Of course there will be those who produce only the beginning and who receives only the contrary, but the goal should be to find a balance between the two parties.
• Italy el'ingerenza strong influence of religious power, what is the situation in other countries? What should be the relationship between society knowledge and religious power?
• I believe that there is no certain knowledge, every point of arrival must be the starting point so that the search never stops
• requires only one extra-national organization that mean the relationship between business entity research and states (the model I have in mind is the century of which we spoke Beccari)
• free creativity: we must not think that because we talk about science you can not talk about creativity.
• Be critical of knowledge: we may become, if not ideology
• Thinking about science as a culture in which the citizen needs
(Cecilia Sereni Lucarelli)
0 comments:
Post a Comment