Thursday, October 30, 2008

Heated Battery Operated Blankets

Impressions

Here we are, everyone returned to Cesena, in our homes, in our city, our home state.
The project was truly amazing: he gave us the opportunity to exchange views, thoughts, come into contact with different cultures, and I must say that this was nothing short of amazing.



is not something common that can happen every day, be heard by people interested or not, politicians, authorities, experts and peers from all over Europe, but it's something that certainly gave us strength and power, something that we will score, and especially in the near future, we think they have actively contributed to the knowledge society.
What can I say, thank you all panel Italian, you were fantastic, and I have endured (for 10 days) and I have known, and all the other boys with whom we have had the opportunity to "work" and above all that we could meet.
Thank you all.
Ilaria Faggiano

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Essentialism, Progressivism And Behaviorism

Science: a central room for a moment with Doubts

The first of two meetings with Dr. Teodoro Georgiadis of the CNR, Institute of Biometeorology was held at the Red Room Theatre San Biagio to 'teach the topic of global warming. This we did not expect were the questions that the doctor has put us all at once 'beginning of the conference. It was a really nice box (I confess that I enjoyed it a lot!): The starting point was simple, what was the meaning of the word anthropogenic, that is, if the causes of climate change resulting from human activity. To get to the end, however, it took us about two hours through several topics.

- Scientific knowledge was defined as a profane knowledge. Science has in itself a part of religion? The answer was: Today, more than ever, science is getting closer to religion. In fact, the general consensus scientists on a certain topic does not lead to more debate and exchange of views, the one who thinks differently is automatically cut off and everything reflects the religious system in which all credeno a certain thing which is presented as true by the servants of God .
- The fact that everyone 's agreement is understood by the people on that particular topic as if you were a true knowledge and that what has been said is true. But the reality is not so: as Socrates said, the truly wise and expert is one who 'knows he does not know' and the same applies to science: it has in it a room for doubts.
- But this 'room of Doubts' what is? Start by explaining the difference between basic research, applied research and targeted research. The first has as its primary objective the advancement of knowledge and is exploratory and often driven by curiosity, interest and intuition of the researcher, conducted without a practical purpose in mind. Applied research, other than that intended, as its objective the exploitation of knowledge for practical purposes and is performed in industry or in universities with funding from the industries concerned. Finally, the purpose was a purpose to be achieved even before the scan starts: in fact, political scientists or industrial commission work and for him to play aspettanano the time of their set.
- Times of science, however, does not coincide with those of politics: the 'politician needs to get the science results immediately applicable, because theirs is an act in the present, then the thing is not good in ten years is their problem.
- To make science funding is needed: the politicians are trying to address the new scientific studies that are more relevant to the problems of nationality, such as, for example, climate change: they know, in fact, that if you propose new solutions for those specific topics , then the consensus and the votes that will get the population will be greater. But democracy is given from awareness, ie knowing exactly what you will choose and what these will, and is also given to participation: being part of a State means an interest in the events and debates, no longer do to the city once indifferent to all his surroundings, not on its interests.
- Scientists, however, can not make forecasts: the forecast is a finished object, mathematical knowledge of the previous data, their analysis one can say what will happen in the future, with a near-certainty.
- The answer then give the scientist the company is a scenario: it is neither science nor the scientific method, but a 'hypothesis for what might happen in the future. Think of it as a room full of switches: each switch corresponds to a possible alternative to what will happen, the scientist tries to make the most logical combinations of these switches, considering numerous factors such as the development of society, physics, past findings, factors linked among them ... .
- Those who definitely should not take into account catastrophic and deniers are: first, for example when referring to our future, say that all die. The latter, however, argue that the Earth is not absolutely nothing happening. Yet we know very well that Some climate change is occurring or that if we know the end of our world, then we already know all about our future, even the smallest detail. But in both these ways it is claimed to know all the cone, when science said they did not have all the answers to our questions, do not possess the truth.
- Science has a knowledge that is not full, because the truth is not confined to science, but science is to contribute to this' last: and here, our room of Doubts, left open for possible errors and this we can not predict (as a principle of precaution) in our scenario, in what scientists offer the world, as a precautionary principle.
- Now, finally, climate change is occurring and this can not be questioned. It is true that 'man has his faults, but to remedy should not focus all of its interest in a particular case (eg' emission of carbon dioxide) and try to solve them only that: he must leave open the 'horizon to many factors that can determine in this case global warming scenarios and by knowing that they never possess a thorough knowledge and which will allow for a room for doubts (Giulia Guidazzi).

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Dismantling Noma Christmas Trees

These are our suggestions in view meeting of the French in October (20-27)

Francesco Furno

Some suggestions about knowledge

The knowledge is very important in a KBS because:
it has to help the cityzen to orientate himself in the society, giving him the mean to understand where he could look for information in order to face each kind of situation. It is impossible for a cityzen to know everything; what is possible is, instead, to give the cityzen the chance to understand the basis of every situation and, consequentely, to find the required information.
it has to be “organic”; this means that the cityzen has to understand that all kinds of knowledge are linked together and every concept reminds to another one. Only being aware of this a cityzen could be prepared to understand the basis of every situation
the base-knowledge of a cityzen has to be simple and easily available to him, it has to be discursive but correct; only in a second time the cityzen has to develp a scientific and deep approach to the knowledge. This is the only way for a person to build a orientative knowledge.
The knowledge is strongly linked with emotions: in fact, every knowledge a person develops has emotions inside. Anyway, the amount of emotions impressed changes from a knowledge to another. The important thing is: the more emotions there are, the more efficient and strong the knowledge is. It is fundamental to develop an educational sistem that considers emotion more than nowadays.

A suggestions about economics

We need that the spheres of power, as economy, do not interfere in the decision-process but, instead, knowledge remains more clear and pure as possible, because it is the only right criterion of making-decisions.

A consideration on Freedom
When you are in a society you have to be aware of the fact that your freedom is not absolute; in fact, you have to sacrify a little part of it for the other members of the society. In change of this, you will receive protection and safety.

A consideration on Duty
If we want to build a society that really works, we have to own the awareness of the function of duty; in fact, duty is the glue that keeps together all the members of society. Duty grows up from knowledge: only by understanding how the society works, what are the advantages and what are the issues, we can feel a sense of duty for our society.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Ilona Piotrowska

- European knowledge-based society should not break up the humanistic knowledge from the scientific one
- It is indispensable to reduce the level of illiteracy. We ought to read more newspapers. Internet: check the truth of information that are often false. Medium: free circulation of all news that must not be selected.
- School: more contemporary history 1) to know better our society 2) to be able to make (for example: politics) decision
- English language: News or other TV programs should have english language subtitles

__________________________________________________________________________________

Giulia Guidazzi

School and education

- In Europe there are lots of guys who have got problems in the society in which they live because of poverty, family hardships and other problematic backgrounds . These teen-agers could put themselves on the wrong track ( drug, underworld, thefts...) if nobody helps them. School and teachers must help these people economically and socially, giving free course books, assistance and a good education.
- In schools young people have to study more the present main themes.
- There should be more chances to do intercultural changes during the school year or the summer.
- To issue new laws to protect school and students: general knowledge and education are our background for the future.

Europe

- A better knowledge of culture, society and costums of nations that belong to Europe: in this way we can avoid episodes of racism between guys or children, our prejudices and we can extend our cultural horizon. We won’t be afraid of foreign people.
- A better study of English and of the most important european languages , to be more advantaged when we will be abroad.

Enviroment

- Young people have to learn how to respect the enviroment and how to know the area in which they live and what it could offer them in the future.
- More right information about the present climatic and enviromental situation.
- Create a recycling programme, search an alternative power source and new solutions about the sustainable development of water, soil, air... .
- Promote the use of public transports to reduce the emissions of carbon dioxide.
- People have to be informed about security in dangerous situations and how to protect themselves or to help other poor people.

Politics

- Favour more meetings between young people of all Europe, setting up events like this project or other cultural celebrations.
- A greater patnership between european nations to favour the diplomacy and debetes between politicians.
- Favour the dialogue between young people and politicians because their taken decisions have repercussions on us and on our future.
- There should be a better knowledge about science, medicine, neoroscience, actuality ... .

__________________________________________________________________________________

Giulia Raggi

Communication

I believe that one of the biggest pillars on which the "society of knowledge" should be based is communication. We, citizens of Europe, must work hard together, and I think the better way to do that is discussing. Exchanging opinions, points of view, discussing and giving advice about what we have to change, improve or introduce in every field (Science, Society, Culture, Education and so on) are what we must do to create our society.

Knowledge

I would divide this pillar in two points:

-Kwowledge of foreign languages to communicate;
-Knowledge "the others".

What I mean is:

-as we cannot coomunicate in many different languages, we must learn, as if it were our mother language, English.
We have to be able to express our opinion and listen to other citizens in English, find solutions in English, discussing in English.
All schools should teach English starting from 6-year-old students for more hours a week than now. English should be considered not only a school subject, but a way, a mean of communication and should be spoken and understood by everyone.

-We can't say "we are Europe" if we don't know each other. As a matter of fact, it can be possible. We can know citizens of Europe if we study their history, their backgrounds, their country and cities geographically, if we visit their countries and learn their lifestyle and talk with them as much as possible. This can happen thanks to an exchange of e-mails (or letters) and some meetings, where young people can discuss and learn those values that in many countries are lost. First of all, we have to learn to respect others and defeat racism, prejudices and xenophobia.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Lorenzo Valzania

1)To promote communication among young Europeans through blogs where you can also interact directly and informally with personalities such as researchers. At the same time the quality of the conversations should be kept good, trusting in the good sense of the bloggers.

2)As suggested by Dr. Beccari, we should make young people aware of all the resources that territory provides. Therefore, we should set up times at school in which the meanings of important terms such as patent, business, technology, resource, innovation are explained.

3) Follows directly from 2) that new generations must be given responsibility, to make them understand that an approach to Knowledge (not only strictly scientific) is a civic duty to make a European knowledge-based society.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Elena Rinaldi

* all the people have to partecipate on diffusing knowledge,this is possible with a base education.
* the citizen have to consider as a civil duty the approach at scientific knowledge.
* science is common sense applied with strectness.it is important create a unique and universal common sense.
* information that come from mass media is influenced by economic,politic and religious interests.people have to be critic and make a selection of informations.
* science is culture and citizen have to become a knowledge able citizen.
* curiosity is tha base of knowledge.
* all the youth have to have the same opportunity to be educated.
* state have to protect the youth.
* society based knowledge is composted to countries with different history,culture and tradition.integration between unit and diversity.
* society based knowledge is different from society based economy:there has to be the same opportunity to do knowledge and not a monopoly fo weathier countries.


Gian Marco Morigi

Research and freedom. Scientists should analyze the possible evolution of their work, in order to make research safer and free of prejudices.
Information. Scientific information should be more open to students and young people, using, for example, the Internet or specific journals which use a language easy to understand but at the same time give correct information.
Mass media. We must put an end to the misuse of scientific information in newspapers and news, for example with a mark which attest a correct use of it in an article or report and which can be released only by an official committee of scientists.
School. The debate on our knowledge-based society should continue inside all european schools, with laws in each country to introduce at least an hour of interdisciplinary discussion on actuality.

Lorenzo Casadei

- Speaking in a simple way is the first step in order to have good connections with the others guys of Europe.
- Mathematics is the foundation of our society; in fact, our society is based on technologies, which are based on science, based on mathematics!
- Curiosity is the base of research. Without it, there won't be any progress. Therefore people should be more stimulated by the society, especially at school and at university.
- In order to create a knowledge society we have to consider the differences we have, also because every country has own culture. For example we have spoken about the culture dimension of science, which contain history, philosophy, traditions of each State.


Cecilia Sereni Lucarelli

How to create an European society of the knowledge?

The knowledge must be democratic and who has the economic monopoly doesn’t have to dominate on the others;

the good sense has to guide us when we do science;

the objective is to create the unity from the differences, I personally believe that the diversity is a richness;

stimulate the curiosity of young people to the knowledge so that they can spontaneously approach to it without being forced;

sometimes the youngsters are afraid of science, so scientific information should be made comprehensible for everyone;

I believe there is not a certain knowledge so every point of arrival must be stings of beginning;

free creativity, only in this case young people feel to be involved in the society of knowledge.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Chiara Marani

Update on school syllabus
I think the subjects we study at school are too much focused on the past. There are several consequences of this:
• Ignorance about the present society
• False commonplaces
• Lack of interest
Strengthen the study about the present let people discuss things that concerns current events, especially among those youngs that, inexpert, have to vote and decide the future of their State. This could be improved introducing the reading of the newspapers during the lessons at school.
Increase in those projects and organizations which work all over the Europe
Enterprises like the one we are doing are deeply important, if we want to build up a European conscience which, I’m sorry, is absent nowadays, al least considering what it is felt in my Country.
Fitting new subjects in the high schools
In my opinion, if we want to create a common belonging to that we call “Europe”, it is of great importance to start teaching law in schools. But, apart from the several laws, it is necessary to understand the differences, the pros and cons of the structures and organizations which rule the so called “Europe”.
Exaltation of the differences
It must be absolutely avoided any form of uniformation. Being a European citizen isn’t as equal as thinking like anyone else, dress as anyone else, speak, believe and live like everybody else. It is completely wrong! Each State, each religion, each creed must be exalted, so that it is possible to become stronger and stronger. This is something easy to be made: let’s study in a proper way the different cultures of the other Countries, let’s make us amazed and astonished if we find something marvelous behind the corner. We can’t keep going forward, if we study only Italian literature, for example, and if we have a general idea ( I wanna underline the word general) of the English one. When we study the philosophy of the Enlightenment, for instance, I am deeply convinced we aren’t able to understand it, if we don’t feel the sharpness of Kant’s language which, incomprehensible, cut your head as a knife. I mean we need more internationality and co-operation among the different subjects.
Emphasis on the foreign languages
Nowadays English language isn’t sufficient. We are asked to speak at least other 2 languages; moreover we know that the more we study them when we are children, the easier it is for us to learn them. Because of this, I suggest teaching them since the nursery school and, which is more important, starting to learn an Asian idiom (Chinese, Japanese…). In addition to this, our feeling of belonging to the so called “Europe” could be improved in opposition to the other cultures. Have we ever considered the fact that, probably, if the history had taken another way, we would have never been here speaking and thinking about what this “union” is? Have we ever reflected on the fact that if the history hadn’t gone in this way, now we probably would have searched for a kimono as Chinese people look for a pair of Dolce and Gabbana shoes? To sum up, I’m asking the insertion of new subjects and new themes to reflect on.
Creation of a youth’s magazine/newspaper
One of the best things of being a young person is the one regarding the fact that you don’t feel any kind of limit: you are determined to express your ideas, to fight for them. So, why can’t we exploit this? I suppose there are lots of young people who wants to publish what they think, what they are interested in. I think it could be great , if we let them write in a newspaper which travels all around the Europe. It could be an opportunity to make adults hear what the so called “not evolved species” has to say to the world.
Let’s stimulate the curiosity avoiding the torpor
The more you are active and dynamic, the more you are propositional. Again youngs are the strata of society which is more sensitive to this: let’s stimulate their mind! Let’s throw them trough the Europe! Let’s make them feel in their hearts the desire for knowledge! Let them study in other countries making easier the bureaucratic machine! Let’s recognize their degrees even in the other nations of the Europe! Let’s arrange a meeting about themes closed to them (politics, human rights, religion, science..)! Moreover, we have to avoid those situations in which ancient teachers keep teaching in the universities, where they are only depressing and boring; this should be followed in all the fields: economy, law, medicine and so on, so that it is possible to keep in touch with the youth and the dynamic movement of the society.
Conclusion
The widespread knowledge shouldn’t have to be felt as a mere erudition, but, on the contrary, as something full of life: a magma which spews out constantly. So, involvement, enthusiasm, curiosity and determination are the key word of its. In conclusion everybody should spread an unitary idea of culture. Everything concerns a common book which has to be daily updated like a diary, where everybody writes his personal page, deeply connected to his intimacy, but, paradoxically, fundamental for each man of the past, of the present and of the future.


Chiara Minotti

• School has a duty to build a citizenship based on knowledge as well as providing quality information to students. It is important to know that knowledge is both scientific and humanistic: that’s why barriers between subjects must be destroyed. Students represent the future, so they are supposed to have a general and complete culture including foreign languages, philosophy and science skills as well as being aware of what is happening around the world.
• Youngsters should acquire a strong sense of responsibility while growing up. We need responsible politicians, responsible scientists, responsible teachers, responsible journalists. A sense of responsibility is definitely necessary for our society. Families, school and also the media should contribute to this kind of formation.
• It is important that especially youngsters feel to be part of Europe. We have to work together to create a better world for everyone, but how can we do so if we actually don’t know each other at all? How can we work as part of a team? I think students should learn at least two foreign languages at school, not only English. Learning a foreign language firstly means learning something more about a new culture. That’s what we need to feel closer and closer to each other.
• Many more projects involving youngsters from all the European countries should be promoted in order to start building the foundations, the background of a common future. I mean, for example, projects involving schools, such as exchanges or European meetings focused on the main issues concerning our countries.
• Environmental issues are becoming more and more important to our society nowadays. That’s why I think that we should focus on how to address research towards the new sources of energy in order to use them as much as possible in the near future.
• In conclusion, the future European citizens must be “knowledge-able” citizens, people who can produce knowledge. This will be possible thanks to INFORMATION, POPULARIZATION (making knowledge easier to acquire and understand for ordinary people), FORMATION (having an influence on the way that something develops), CARE, EDUCATION, PARTICIPATION/CONTRIBUTION.


Ilaria Faggiano

Education is the topic of my reflection and suggestion.

Education provides knowledge, and through knowledge people are informed or know how to provide information that surround them.
So, if people are quite informed they are able to participate activily in order to improve the society and, above all, the democracy, beacuse they are conscious and they have a basic knowledge.
That's why I think that the compulsory school schould be free for everybody, without discriminations or any sort of racism; and also it shouldn't exist differences between private and public school, because as the law says : "citizens are all equal before the law".

Education -> knowledge --> information --> people that knows --> help to democracy


Luca Versari

Communication and information
- Every school might have a furniture of monthly scientific magazines with medium level language but at the same time a specific, objective, actually themes which should be made available for every student who want to consult it. This magazines shouldn’t be deposited in an hidden library but should be put in a big table at the centre of the main hall of the school so its diffusion will be easier and student might became curious about it so read other times.
- Create an easy-access web site where contents were guarantee by some important scientific laboratories. In this web site should be permitted to scientists to explain their own theory or their studies and even the debate between them around a common theme.

Research
- Scientific research have to be totally dissolved by economy and politic. First component of research is freedom of the researcher, for this reason over the organized research promoted by lobbies there should be a free research based on the contribute of citizens.
- Young researcher who have just finished their cycle of studies at university should be helped by offering them a place available for two years where improve and make their own experience following the model of “incubation activity” promoted in USA.

Dialogue
- Students have to take up every year an obligatory journey during summer holidays which will last one month toward an European country so they could learn better English and compare their ideas with people that have different culture and point of view.
- English is the only way to communicate with European community so every citizen of this community must know basilar rules of English language with which deal to an English dialogue. So, more hours of English lessons at school since primary school with comparison supported by online communication.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Getting Rid Of New Shower Curtain Smell

Last minute suggestions More suggestions

Dear wives =),
I list below what I consider to be the now famous tips, hoping not to fall into the banal and obvious. I read many of my ideas to be shared by others: forgive, therefore, the lack of originality. Let's start:
or update the school curriculum.
I believe, as I expressed last meeting, the topics covered at school are too focused on the past: it does not allow a proper understanding of the society in which we live, with the consequent birth of ignorance, myths and unselfish. Enhancing the study of the age is closer to us, it would also can discuss current issues, especially in the fifth class, consisting of those persons who, inexperienced, go to vote and choose what to do about their future and the society around them, perhaps "facilitating" their work by reading newspapers class. Increase
or organizations, institutions and projects that operate in the European sense.
Government initiatives such as Intercultura or our project are the basis for creating a "European consciousness" which, unfortunately, to this day is missing, at least as found in my country. Although we were players in the money exchange, for example, no one has felt it a change in the course of history: belonging to the 'body' Europe 'does not seem to have developed.
or insertion of new materials in high schools.
In order to understand what really are the European Union, the EEC and all the institutions which operate at European level, you must place in school, mainly of middle schools, the study of law. It, as well as the legislative side, must also take responsibility to educate children about the history of European organizations, their training, their orientation, their positives and negatives. This also would greatly enhance the formation of a "European consciousness".
or Exaltation of diversity and particularity.
feel within himself a sense of belonging and community with other members of Europe, should not lead to a standardization of culture, thought, identity, spirit and so on. Quite the opposite! We must embrace diversity and make it our strength. We grow together with the desire and curiosity to investigate a variety of lifestyles, to experience cultural and religious practices unknown to us, let us open ourselves the stranger. Achieving this is simple: why do not we try to live out the foreign countries we visit, we study more about their cultures, their history, their philosophy, their literature, wondering when, around the corner, we make a monument unexpected surprise. Not only can you study Italian literature and have an idea very very much (and to stress very much!) Vague than the English! When we study the philosophy of the Enlightenment, for example, we can not fully understand if not tasted the bitterness of the Kantian language, if you do not feel a sense of words which, while understandable, they cut off the mind with their edges. E 'need for greater international and interdisciplinary.
Studio or enhanced foreign language
also linked to above, highlights the need to study foreign languages. The English is not enough Moreover, it is enough now to this day. The borders are so open that I consider essential to introduce a requirement since kindergarten study of two European languages \u200b\u200b(except English) and an Eastern language. It is an oriental language. We can feel part of that vast mechanism that is unknown to us, we call "Europe" is also calling for contrast but to do this, you need to know what's after our borders, getting closer to those huge territories to us almost completely unknown. I'm talking, of course, China, Japan, India etc etc. For me it would be very interesting to know the history of these countries even today to understand how we can ask questions about the continent in which we live. And if the barbarian invasions rather forget and turn to the European territories in Asia had continued to threaten us, our project would exist today? We would still be colonizers or become colonized? It would still prevail on the Orient or the West we might be looking to us for a kimono as it is now looking for shoes by Dolce and Gabbana? There is an increasing need, therefore, to add new programs and new materials on these topics.
or Creating a European magazine for young people. What
reflected in the youth of my generation, is also the desire to hear their point of view, their criticisms against the status quo, new ideas, in short, of being called into question in a society that, in contrast, tend to marginalize them as "racially" inferior not yet evolved. Why not create a newspaper (daily, monthly, annual ..) where the boys, in relation to the quality of their work, they can publish their projects and participate actively in the creation of their future?
or arouse curiosity without the numbness.
E 'has been known that more and more active you are proactive and dynamic. Young people are part of society more prone to these features by their nature are not afraid to be daring, are not yet a prey to the theories of "adult" that can not see a change but still have the grit to fight for their ideals. Why not fuel this fire inside? Stimulate their minds and their faculty with projects like ours, lanciamoli to Europe, we ardergli in the chest this desire for knowledge. Favoriamoli if they want to study in other countries, riconosciamogli their educational qualifications outside their countries, we organize conferences on topics close to them (political, human rights, environment, religion, science ...). In addition, we avoid that are found in universities to teach young people with octogenarians who have more to do, let us not send (I refer mainly to Italy) representatives around the world who are so far away from the future, from social unrest, the progress that produce nothing but the analogue of what the left did in post-unity government, namely: the "transformation".
or conclusions.
The widespread knowledge can not be perceived as a mere erudition, but rather as dynamic, in perpetual motion and fibrillation: a magma eruption continues. Nor can it regardless of the emotions involved, transport, determination, curiosity is, to me, the words that best characterize it. In conclusion, we must also strive to give effect to a unitary idea of \u200b\u200bculture and not fragmented. Everything ago part of a book that is updated daily as a diary, in which each of us writes his own personal page, which is closely linked to their intimacy, but, paradoxically, essential to all other men of the past, present, future (Chiara Marani).

Littlest Pet Shop Als Clipart



Elena Rinaldi

* Have all the people to participate on Diffusing knowledge, this is possible with a basic education.
* Have to Consider the citizen as a civil duty at the approach scientific knowledge. *
science is applied with common sense strectness.it is important to create unique and universal common sense. * That as
information from the media is influenced by Economic, Politic and religious interests.people have to be critic and make a selection of informations.
* science is culture and citizen have to become a knowledge able citizen.
* curiosity is tha base of knowledge.
* all the youth have to have the same opportunity to be educated.
* state have to protect the youth.
* society based knowledge is composted to countries with different history,culture and tradition.integration between unit and diversity.
* society based knowledge is different from society based economy:there has to be the same opportunity to do knowledge and not a monopoly fo weathier countries.


Gian Marco Morigi

Research and freedom. Scientists should analyze the possible evolution of their work, in order to make research safer and free of prejudices.
Information. Scientific information should be more open to students and young people, using, for example, the Internet or specific journals which use a language easy to understand but at the same time give correct information.
Mass media. We must put an end to the misuse of scientific information in newspapers and news, for example with a mark which attest a correct use of it in an article or report and which can be released only by an official committee of scientists.
School. The debate on our knowledge-based society should continue inside all european schools, with laws in each country to introduce at least an hour of interdisciplinary discussion on actuality.

Lorenzo Casadei

- Speaking in a simple way is the first step in order to have good connections with the others guys of Europe.
- Mathematics is the foundation of our society; in fact, our society is based on technologies, which are based on science, based on mathematics!
- Curiosity is the base of research. Without it, there won't be any progress. Therefore people should be more stimulated by the society, especially at school and at university.
- In order to create a knowledge society we have to consider the differences we have, also because every country has own culture. For example we have spoken about the culture dimension of science, which contain history, philosophy, traditions of each State.


Cecilia Sereni Lucarelli

How to create an European society of the knowledge?

The knowledge must be democratic and who has the economic monopoly doesn’t have to dominate on the others;

the good sense has to guide us when we do science;

the objective is to create the unity from the differences, I personally believe that the diversity is a richness;

stimulate the curiosity of young people to the knowledge so that they can spontaneously approach to it without being forced;

sometimes the youngsters are afraid of science, so scientific information should be made comprehensible for everyone;

I believe there is not a certain knowledge so every point of arrival must be stings of beginning;

free creativity, only in this case young people feel to be Involved in the society of knowledge.

Male Waxing In Georgia

After the second phase of the project, are preparing to carry out deliveries

Since we are in the pipeline and efforts should be intensified in view of the French week, I feel the need to take stock of the work, certain information and clarify some aspects of the next phases of work. A few months ago
know the objectives of the project. We must produce twenty suggestions of European importance to be delivered to European Commissioner for Scientific Research on October 27.
Each national panel, to define its work program, has received from some national coordinator directions to be followed (objective, scientific committee, the number of participants, heterogeneous grouping, some methodological suggestions ...) and white paper in relation to other organizational aspects.

In planning the route, given the difficulty involved in the delivery receipt, we have prioritized the training aspect. We looked for meetings with those involved in science and knowledge from different points of view: psychiatrists, historians, philosophers, physicists, mathematicians, biologists, sociologists, meteorologists, engineers, therapists, teachers and researchers. It 'was a challenging course developed in two particularly critical of the school year and tiring. The objective was to offer an overview of the most broad and diverse as possible, although not exhaustive, the subjects 'knowledge' and 'society'.

On the way we proceeded working on two parallel planes. On the one hand we have taken care to build the memory of this experience through the minutes, shooting photos and video, website, database and blog. On the other we began to gather the thoughts, at first sporadic, piecemeal and individual. Later more elaborate and more focused, the result of earlier discussions. And so we came to taking the first negotiation that took place last Friday when you have identified the key words that led to Francis and Helen Paris. What you have drawn it was not easy, nor is it simplistic. Every word conceals much thought, deep analysis, a great time for the exchange and debate.
Francis and Elena have been able to tell her to Paris, have revived those moments to the listener. Your work has been recognized, valued, appreciated. Intelligent, open, able to argue, when they express their words are strong. These messages have arrived at this time to my email address.

Now we can say also completed the second phase of our work. And we must face the ultimate commitment. The largest, but also the most engaging. If you really want your suggestions, Your views, your analysis is considered, evaluated, discussed, we must try to make suggestions in writing and in English of great intelligence and quality. We need to write those beautiful ideas, that tell you know so well. We need to communicate in a simple, but argued. We have to clean them and fill them with the obvious one that is truly your feeling.
In this phase that begins now and will continue throughout our trip to France we will be present to ourselves and to his companions, responsive and proactive. Prof Cerroni, who along with Dr. Hamon reads us a copy, will be on our side. In those hours he received your last drawn oversee our work and giving us his point of view. Lionel Larqué, the European coordinator, is at this time to establish guidelines, which we will refer in the next few days.
The objective is: to produce in a form and content quality, consistency and unity. You young people, and we adults. Only this will allow us to communicate in an authoritative manner with our partners.

The first delivery is to be completed so the revision of your latest proposals, the measures discussed Friday. We have to turn them into suggestions, focused and motivated. Identifying a problem and propose a solution or an intervention. We have to make them less generic. I gather them, will group them by theme and send them to France where panels will be disseminated to all participants. To begin the first real large share of the work.
Then on Monday during the journey begins with skimming, in view of the first comparison that will be on Monday late afternoon in Lyon.

Nadia

Can I Put Money On My Biolife Card

Education

Education is the topic of my reflection and suggestion.

Education Provides knowledge, through knowledge and people are informed or know how to Provide Information That Surround Them.
So, if people are quite informed activily They Are Able to Participate in order to Improve the society and, above all, the democracy, beacuse They are conscious and They Have a basic knowledge.
That's why I think that the compulsory school schould be free for everybody, without discriminations or any sort of racism; and also it shouldn't exist differences between private and public school, because as the law says : "citizens are all equal before the law".

Education -> knowledge --> information --> people that knows --> help to democracy

Ilaria Faggiano

How To Clean Fuzzy Inside Of Moccasins

The panel's suggestions are designing

Francesco Furno

Some suggestions about knowledge

The knowledge is very important in a KBS because:
it has to help the cityzen to orientate himself in the society, giving him the mean to understand where he could look for information in order to face each kind of situation. It is impossible for a cityzen to know everything; what is possible is, instead, to give the cityzen the chance to understand the basis of every situation and, consequentely, to find the required information.
it has to be “organic”; this means that the cityzen has to understand that all kinds of knowledge are linked together and every concept reminds to another one. Only being aware of this a cityzen could be prepared to understand the basis of every situation
the base-knowledge of a cityzen has to be simple and easily available to him, it has to be discursive but correct; only in a second time the cityzen has to develp a scientific and deep approach to the knowledge. This is the only way for a person to build a orientative knowledge.
The knowledge is strongly linked with emotions: in fact, every knowledge a person develops has emotions inside. Anyway, the amount of emotions impressed changes from a knowledge to another. The important thing is: the more emotions there are, the more efficient and strong the knowledge is. It is fundamental to develop an educational sistem that considers emotion more than nowadays.

A suggestions about economics

We need that the spheres of power, as economy, do not interfere in the decision-process but, instead, knowledge remains more clear and pure as possible, because it is the only right criterion of making-decisions.

A consideration on Freedom
When you are in a society you have to be aware of the fact that your freedom is not absolute; in fact, you have to sacrify a little part of it for the other members of the society. In change of this, you will receive protection and safety.

A consideration on Duty
If we want to build a society that really works, we have to own the awareness of the function of duty; in fact, duty is the glue that keeps together all the members of society. Duty grows up from knowledge: only by understanding how the society works, what are the advantages and what are the issues, we can feel a sense of duty for our society.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Giulia Guidazzi

School and education

- In Europe there are lots of guys who have got problems in the society in which they live because of poverty, family hardships and other problematic backgrounds . These teen-agers could put themselves on the wrong track ( drug, underworld, thefts...) if nobody helps them. School and teachers must help these people economically and socially, giving free course books, assistance and a good education.
- In schools young people have to study more the present main themes.
- There should be more chances to do intercultural changes during the school year or the summer.
- To issue new laws to protect school and students: general knowledge and education are our background for the future.

Europe

- A better knowledge of culture, society and costums of nations that belong to Europe: in this way we can avoid episodes of racism between guys or children, our prejudices and we can extend our cultural horizon. We won’t be afraid of foreign people.
- A better study of English and of the most important european languages , to be more advantaged when we will be abroad.

Enviroment

- Young people have to learn how to respect the enviroment and how to know the area in which they live and what it could offer them in the future.
- More right information about the present climatic and enviromental situation.
- Create a recycling programme, search an alternative power source and new solutions about the sustainable development of water, soil, air... .
- Promote the use of public transports to reduce the emissions of carbon dioxide.
- People have to be informed about security in dangerous situations and how to protect themselves or to help other poor people.

Politics

- Favour more meetings between young people of all Europe, setting up events like this project or other cultural celebrations.
- A greater patnership between european nations to favour the diplomacy and debetes between politicians.
- Favour the dialogue between young people and politicians because their taken decisions have repercussions on us and on our future.
- There should be a better knowledge about science, medicine, neoroscience, actuality ... .

__________________________________________________________________________________

Giulia Raggi

Communication

I believe that one of the biggest pillars on which the "society of knowledge" should be based is communication. We, citizens of Europe, must work hard together, and I think the better way to do that is discussing. Exchanging opinions, points of view, discussing and giving advice about what we have to change, improve or introduce in every field (Science, Society, Culture, Education and so on) are what we must do to create our society.

Knowledge

I would divide this pillar in two points:

-Kwowledge of foreign languages to communicate;
-Knowledge "the others".

What I mean is:

-as we cannot coomunicate in many different languages, we must learn, as if it were our mother language, English.
We have to be able to express our opinion and listen to other citizens in English, find solutions in English, discussing in English.
All schools should teach English starting from 6-year-old students for more hours a week than now. English should be considered not only a school subject, but a way, a mean of communication and should be spoken and understood by everyone.

-We can't say "we are Europe" if we don't know each other. As a matter of fact, it can be possible. We can know citizens of Europe if we study their history, their backgrounds, their country and cities geographically, if we visit their countries and learn their lifestyle and talk with them as much as possible. This can happen thanks to an exchange of e-mails (or letters) and some meetings, where young people can discuss and learn those values that in many countries are lost. First of all, we have to learn to respect others and defeat racism, prejudices and xenophobia.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Lorenzo Casadei

- Semplicity is the better way to give information; if we create clear raccomandations, we'll be understood better.
- Mathematics in the future of our society, so in order to create an effcient society we have to put attention on mathematics.
- Curiosity is the base of the research. Without curiosity, there won't be any progress.
- in order to create a knowledge society we have to consider the differnt types of culture we have, also because every country has the own culture.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Lorenzo Valzania

1)To promote communication among young Europeans through blogs where you can also interact directly and informally with personalities such as researchers. At the same time the quality of the conversations should be kept good, trusting in the good sense of the bloggers.

2)As suggested by Dr. Beccari, we should make young people aware of all the resources that territory provides. Therefore, we should set up times at school in which the meanings of important terms such as patent, business, technology, resource, innovation are explained.

3) Follows directly from 2) that new generations must be given responsibility, to make them understand that an approach to Knowledge (not only strictly scientific) is a civic duty to make a European knowledge-based society.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Is There A Product To Fix Torn Leather

Italian Francesco Furno: some suggestions about knowledge

The knowledge is very important in a KBS because:
it has to help the cityzen to orientate himself in the society, giving him the mean to understand where he could look for information in order to face each kind of situation. It is impossible for a cityzen to know everything; what is possible is, instead, to give the cityzen the chance to understand the basis of every situation and, consequentely, to find the required information.
it has to be “organic”; this means that the cityzen has to understand that all kinds of knowledge are linked together and every concept reminds to another one. Only being aware of this a cityzen could be prepared to understand the basis of every situation
the base-knowledge of a cityzen has to be simple and easily available to him, it has to be discursive but correct; only in a second time the cityzen has to develp a scientific and deep approach to the knowledge. This is the only way for a person to build a orientative knowledge.
The knowledge is strongly linked with emotions: in fact, every knowledge a person develops has emotions inside. Anyway, the amount of emotions impressed changes from a knowledge to another. The important thing is: the more emotions there are, the more efficient and strong the knowledge is. It is fundamental to develop an educational sistem that considers emotion more than nowadays.

A suggestions about economics

We need that the spheres of power, as economy, do not interfere in the decision-process but, instead, knowledge remains more clear and pure as possible, because it is the only right criterion of making-decisions.

A consideration on Freedom
When you are in a society you have to be aware of the fact that your freedom is not absolute; in fact, you have to sacrify a little part of it for the other members of the society. In change of this, you will receive protection and safety.
A consideration on Duty

If We Want to build a society that really works, We have to own the awareness of the function of duty, in fact, is the duty That Keeps glue together all the members of society. Duty grows up from knowledge: only by understanding how the society works, what are the advantages and what are the issues, we can feel a sense of duty for Our Society.

Nicotine Gum And Tooth Decay

Minutes of the meeting of 12 October in Paris

We propose now the report of the meeting Sunday, October 12, which was held in the building where the seat of the French Association des Petits Debrouillards from 10.00 to 17.30 or so.

- At the meeting were: Francis and Elena for the panel Italian, Bruno and Ana for the panel Portuguese Amerie and Olivia for the panel French, German Nina for the panel, and Peter Morgan for the panel Belgian Jim, the adult representative panel of English boys, Frederique, one of the organizers of the project (French), Lionel, the coordinator of the project (French).

- Lionel introduced the program of the day:
- Presentation of Our panel;
--what we did as a panel;
--what we did not do as a panel;
--what things are going to happen in Our panel and what plans we haves;
--who we met;
--Understand global issues of the panels.

- The first question we refer is that of the English Panel: Jim began his presentation describing the work of his organization. He works with young boys around the age of 15-16 years 'Socially Excluded', ie living in difficult circumstances and in the margins of society because of poverty, family problems, bullying, problematic backgrounds. They then find themselves involved in the crime scene, leaving the school curriculum and are in no way protected by the state. It 'obvious that these guys do not have the opportunity to interact with and engage the society in which they live. They fall in drug use, often find themselves in prison or, in some cases, even lose track of them. Some of them want to build a future, have a family, "they are inspired," as said Jim. Many of them never even got on a train, there are many moves and organizational problems in the management of all movements with these young people who are not "young" but are "children". For these reasons, Jim has come to represent them in this preliminary meeting and during the Science Week (20-28 October) will be present only for a few days. The really important thing to understand, and we have the duty to report is that they participate symbolically as a symbol of that part, very wide, of young men in Europe who do not have the same opportunities as boys, for example, we will be protected, listened and made a participant in the processes of society. Their mission is "to remind" all of us that we must not forget this relatively high proportion of young people in our project to build a European knowledge society by young people. These young people need protection first and foremost for their basic needs, that refers to a discrete economic needs and, secondly, they should have the opportunity as others to enter into the gears of this new company evolved to looming ' horizon. Thus, the request was to move all the panels is to generate at least one suggestion that takes into account the condition of these guys, starting with the example of the English panel.
- It 's perfectly normal we have not yet developed the 20 recommendations. In fact, the production of recommendations begins now, after the comparison between the various panels and briefings on the guidelines to follow which will expose later. With regard to the recommendations it is necessary to arrive in Paris with very clear ideas and almost all the recommendations have already been written. It will be possible in the first part of the week to process or refine the final recommendations along with the other panel and then on Sunday there will be a huge three-hour meeting with all the panels will be established where the 20 final and final recommendations to be submitted the commissioners.
- Although we found a great homogeneity on content and the topics covered, there were two ways to proceed in the way done so far: the first, ours, that they have produced several books / essays in which various concepts were larvatamente contents (values), the second way is, as did the Portuguese panel, directly in making the recommendations (which will report later) explaining the various concepts. Both ways of working need the final implementation.
- Here is now the main premise: This project is viewed by commissioners and politicians as a great window-dressing, bound to a certain type of marketing, which takes into account, but on the contrary, devalues \u200b\u200bthe content created. Here because, as said Nadia, the more we give concrete shape to our thoughts (essays, tests, summaries, etc. ...), we make our concepts more clear, more will bring them to their essence / real root, the less chance there will be to diminish the work done by the panels. Lionel, tired of seeing cataloged the thought of young people as poor, simple, "stupid", he asks at all costs to be as effective.
- Here are some practical guidelines that have been provided:
- the first key thing to remember is that the project is titled "The young people in building a European knowledge society", therefore we are called to reflect and to develop recommendations in which the word young is strictly limited. In fact - has specified Lionel - no need for the project, for example, know the mode of scientific methodology unless it is somehow attributable to issues that we as young people perceive. We therefore feel particularly called into question because, although it was interesting and educational - as even stated Lionel - more detailed work of general concepts such as ours, it did not take enough into account the fact that every idea must be connected to word young. Therefore, to understand, in our opinion (Francis and Helen), discuss the difference between research basic and applied research, although it is fundamental to our training staff does not fall directly in the demands of the project, unless someone shows them the link.
- The second-line guide for the formulation of recommendations: The recommendations should be as concise and direct, should not contain vague or concepts which you have no real control would be useless because it is better to accompany a simple but concrete example to to demonstrate the relevance and veracity of the idea contained in the recommendation, in general, any recommendation must have an impact applications, that is, the recommendation is issued a specific request by we young people and the recommendation must be generally accepted, although you can submit ideas shared only by young people (preferably specifying it) or ideas which, although not known, an effective application, are considered highly useful and meaningful.
- Finally, since each concept, as it could be, for example, "information" is used in the recommendations with a precise meaning to maturity, you can create a sort of "introduction" which sets out quite clearly with what implications this period is reported. This premise (or frame) should come at the recommendation (we did not understand where it should be placed in the first part of the recommendation or as an introduction to the general recommendations).
- Given the heterogeneous nature of the nations in the EU and participating in this project can be found two types of recommendations:
- the first, like that of our panel, which aims to develop an entire community with a deep conceptual work in the improvement and development;
- the second-, typical of the countries that joined the EU and more recently for various reasons very different in terms of internal development, requires aloud the possibility of reaching the same conditions of development of countries on the "crest of a wave" (Furniss), like ours.
- Finally, we were made aware that on November 14 2008, before the commissioners, to Nobel prize winners, the French minister for communication and other honorable members qualified in the field, will be the official submission and consideration of the work done in all these months, culminating in the production of recommendations. In essence, this date will be taken into consideration the recommendations made by the 27 panels. On this occasion, though it is still premature, the news has been requested the participation of one or two representatives from each panel who come to attend the event.
- As mentioned by Nadia, the project organizers have hinted at a possible continuation of the project. The news, however, is still very nebulous.

must now assign a task to everyone:
since there was a report highly requested and summary style recommendations, concepts that we, as a panel Italian, touched in recent months so that they can then share with other panels and take a real team effort, you must:
- that everyone goes to fish out the articles, texts, essays, summaries made by himself and extrapolate that clearly and concisely the main concepts and deliver them in simple sentences (one or two lines) in English.
- to complete this work by Tuesday evening and send it to Nadia who will turn then to Lionel.
We understand that a job is demanding and tiring for everything. However, the remaining time is less and less, and you must make a sacrifice to get prepared, which we are now. In addition, we must already start thinking about how to express ourselves in English, to search for the words they consider most appropriate in English because there are other ways of communication if not in English. It was not easy to express our ideas in English, but we did it. We have spoken English for three days. The suggestion is in fact already beginning to think of our concepts in English now that we are still in Italy and we can verify it, why not then there will be others (Frank Furno and Elena Rinaldi)

Flucloxacillin Antibiotic Chest Infection

Meeting of 12 October in Paris: travel program

- Friday evening departure from Cesena, at 20:13
- Arrival in Bologna, at 21.15
- Change trains and flights from Bologna, 22:15 (10 minutes late)
- Travel at night in the cabin with bunks, arriving in Paris Bercy 09:45 hours
- Entry into the Metro and to call for instructions
Tamer - Purchase tickets and travel by metro to Porte de la Villette where is the "City of Science and Industry"
- Search Tamer within the City. After a riot there Tamer: He takes stock of Francis and takes us off at the bus line and provides us with instructions to arrive at the home of Sophie in which we have to leave your luggage Elena.
- At about 12:00 we arrived at the home of Sophie, Auberville in a peripheral suburb of Paris. We leave the luggage of Elena and we set an appointment for 19:00 in a downtown restaurant.
- Take the subway and we go off at Chatelet, in the heart of Paris, and start a patrol of the area that includes the observation of islands in the middle of the Seine (where among other things, is Notre Dame) and the area surroundings. We find a restaurant for lunch at about 14:45. French food we taste. After lunch we resumed our journey and head to the Pantheon and the Sorbonne university and take this opportunity also to look at a few stores.
- At 19:00 we go in "Le Fresque" where we meet with the group of the project. To expect there are two guys from the Portuguese panel, Bruno (21anni) and Ana (18y.o.). After arriving in succession: Frederique (a girl, organizer of the project) and her roommate, Virginie, Tamer wife, Nina (17 years), the girl on behalf of the German panel and Lionel, the mind of the organization of the project, two boys French Amerie (21anni) and Olivia (16years). During dinner, courtesy, we had the opportunity to make the first knowledge and understand the organization of the boys for the project. Apart from their better organization in the move, it emerged that the Italian group are in more close-knit and homogeneous: in fact, the boys of the other panels are from schools, cities, different regions and have fewer opportunities for mutual involvement. In any case the work done by the various panels seems to be going in that direction.
- Nina spent the night as a guest at the home of Lionel, and the two French boys and the two boys are the Portuguese were guests at the home of Frederique; Elena was hosted at the home of Frank and Sophie's house Tamer and Virginia. All we have moved underground.
- The morning after the meeting has been established in the building project "Petits Debrouillard" located near the "City of Science and Industry" at 10.00.
- Two guys from the panel of Belgium, and Peter Morgan, met us at the meeting which lasted until around 17.30 and was stopped for lunch from 13.30 to 14.45 in an Italian restaurant, where Francis has forced the boys of the other panels to experience the Italian cuisine, with some success. In general, the climate was very positive and has worked hard with great ease.
- At the end of the meeting, Morgan and Nina are shared immediately, we and the other guys we went to visit the "City of Science and Industry" and we had the opportunity to spend a pleasant late afternoon.
- After that, along with Sophie and we went exploring Frederique of one of the most typical of Paris: Montmartre, also known as the artists' quarter. We had the opportunity to enjoy crepes, and other special gauffres French. We took a long walk for these warm and cozy Parisian streets and finally we went to dinner at a restaurant very private, very cozy and the walls papered with drawings, prints, posters and photographs depicting the Vintage-style big city attractions such as the Moulin Rouge. After dinner we continued our walk, we took the subway and we headed to the streets dedicated to the exploration of social life: Sexy Shop, Sexy pub, the "Moulin Rouge", the disco "The Folies de Pigalle." After that we headed to each respective holes and we said goodbye to the other boys, with a slight hint of bitterness. We returned to the accommodation at 23.30 or so.
- Wake up at 6.00 am and by appointment to the Metro stop near the house of Tamer at 7:00 am. From there, after saying goodbye to Sophie, we went to the Gare de Lyon where we took the train to Milan Centrale at 07:42.
- We arrived in Milan at 15.30 and we took the intercity train to Cesena at 16 .. 05. The arrival in Cesena is scheduled at 19.15.
- In the train we have prepared this summary of the stages of the journey and the practical instructions that have been suggested (taxes) during the meeting on Sunday. (Francesco Furno and Elena Rinaldi)

Best Mount And Blade Mode

Keywords

meeting last Friday, October 10, resulting in the following keywords, which likely will cover most of our 20 recommendations. In the meantime, expect the contribution that Francis and Helen certainly lead us after the meeting yesterday!
Here are the keywords:

Knowledge

Information / dissemination

Communication / language, methods, ways, means

Search

Common sense

Education / Education - News?

Responsibility

Curiosity

Participation

Economics

Policy **

Religion Languages \u200b\u200b** **

Emotions freedom

European Society

Cooperation Dialogue

Need - trust

Science = guarantor of scientific

Critics

Territory

Method

Culture

Scientific Method - Universal



** = spheres of power (interest)

Friday, October 10, 2008

How To Clean Pedestal Sink Pipes

last encounter problems and ideas to create a knowledge society

* In the panels of other nations visited a number of points have arisen in regard to the environment, climate, politics, then you should seek the suggestions on these topics we have faced a lesser way.

We talked mainly of knowledge, scientific research, and democratic society based on science.

* There may be a knowledge society? Knowledge there can be a fair and equitable in all the states? Probably not, that's why you have the risk of a monopoly of knowledge by stronger nations.
* Can a society of knowledge consists of states with its own history, culture and tradition? Must take account of this diversity to create unity.
* Knowledge is closely linked to communication, how communication? Need to create relationships between society and scientific citizenship: the importance the school.
* "The company is the knowledge that the individuals of that society produces." All people should participate in the dissemination of knowledge asttraverso training and basic education. *
citizens must recognize their civic duty as the approach to knowledge scientifically. *
the goal is to create a society of knowledge, based on scienza.In that is how you can do science? Science is common sense applied with rigor, but as common sense? Need to create a unique and universal common sense. *
basic research and applied research: it is important to support research by investing money, each country must be able to do and develop research.
* must keep alive the spirit of science, this is also manitene through criticism but to make us critical Déesse a basic knowledge and basic information.
* You need the need for magazines that deal with science at a fair level of communication and understanding.
* The information often comes from the mass media, whose critical threshold has been lowered significantly in coming to talk about a crisis of mass media.avi 'important that people are properly informed as they need to participate in the formation of this company so you must create a new channel of information, perhaps a single channel x tAll nations. *
science is culture and the citizen Able citizen must become knowledge.
* must free their creativity by taking a more common sense. *
curiosity is the basis of knowledge, it is important to arouse the curiosity of the citizens and especially young people who represent the future of our società.Come? Making them part of the questions about the science but also the environment, politics in order to invite them to participate in this great project (Elena Rinaldi).

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Putting On Nail Polish

New proposals by Giulia Raggi

"Have a look here and there among the various documents and leaflets, having had the opportunity to read and enjoy the last posts on this blog from my mates and took a course of study that allows me to have a fairly open mind, due to the fact that much importance is given to the humanities, have I found a possible council, or at least an idea, a draft. Here are my thoughts, hoping not to be too trivial
I was able to find that one of the great pillars on which the knowledge society should be based is that of communication. Communication, we are taught this in the early days of our childhood, occurs through a channel, the box. So, how to talk to Europe? How can arrive at an efficient interaction of the individual?
Guys, I am convinced that, somehow, within the formation of a young (and this certainly also affect the level of education of each, leading to an increase in the level) should be added to the study of foreign languages, at least two (excluding your mother tongue). I know that learning two foreign languages \u200b\u200bhas already been entered for years at school, but I think we should do it that they were dealt with more serious themes, debates were organized in language and encourage, through a program of school, communication between young people, via e-mail or paper, since they are the basis of the future. Do not limit yourself to the most basic knowledge of grammatical structures, but to be able to develop and express arguing, their opinion. Without doubt, the English would gain more importance in the sense that is often overlooked by students and judged on how "tricky". Some people are more inclined and less, but if you began teaching in early childhood and studied for a significant number of hours, in addition, the transmission of foreign languages, or teaching, should be carried out by native speakers . What I mean is: why not try to get serious about a common language, spoken and understood by all (a bit 'as he had tried to do in the seventies with Esperanto, but failed).
Another aspect that I would like to dwell is that of knowledge.
We are trying to work towards the creation of a European knowledge society, therefore, first of all, you should just learn this. Knowing not only concepts or theories, but knowing the "other". How can we expect to collaborate with other European citizens if they do not know? So I strongly believe that in the future education of young people at European level, things should be done about the plans for extending cultural nations outside the European Union, because in fact we are a large community, but lack the relationships and This knowledge often generates non-prejudice, xenophobia or racism. For cultural expansion I mean cultural study, but also geographical and historical, for example, countries such as France, Germany, Spain and all the others. However
however, to build on this, it would be good there was a return, by all, the so-called values: respect first of all.
Unless we learn to respect us, we could learn and apply all the concepts we want, but you will never have a proper spirit of cooperation, which can arise due to the European knowledge society.
very latest thing, which is more of a challenge: Do not think that the European Parliament is legislating and a little too proactive? (This is a question I sort, but on which I still think about it! But I think that might be a possible draft.)
Hoping not to have bored you and hoping you got some ideas ...
Giulia

What Pinkish Blood In Stool Means?

How to create a European knowledge society?

• Knowledge must be democratic, but who reads that? Is not likely to switch from an attempt to unify knowledge-based society to an approval-in which those who have the economic monopoly, for example, dominates on the other

• The knowledge society is based on science but you can do science at all, common sense should guide us .. but how can there be a universal common sense?

• The objective is to create unity from diversity, do not think it is right to maintain this diversity? I fear that he wanted to create a knowledge society is a bit 'utopia might be better to think before that a knowledge society with a better knowledge of the channel. That is if it is a knowledge society, the first thing you think is in my opinion to give everyone the same possibilities of knowledge, the same opportunities for learning, there must be an "extra-channel" that move across the face knowledge, without posing problems of economic and political interests. Let us ask ourselves: how to create this extra-channel?

Taking a cue from the Italian case I would say, for example, that there should be a journal open to all (other than Focus, which is not science, a middle ground between the two). I know that other countries in this middle ground exists, but the point is right here: In all countries there must be this opportunity, what do you think? Do you have other ideas to solve this problem?

• You can not think of all suddenly become experts in science, perhaps because not all interested, do not believe that knowledge flows should be a basic understanding first of all?

• In recent months we have talked a lot of curiosity, one of the suggestions could be to stimulate the curiosity of young people to know so that we can bring to it spontaneously without being forced. Must therefore create the conditions for which there is the individual participation of individuals.

• make clear to citizens of the knowledge that this type of company is a winner. Science has made great strides to make the man, the future lies in science. Everyone should be aware. We must raise awareness of European citizens.


• The information must be understandable to all. I think most people today "fear" science, not to be avoided for fear of height, not so much for lack of interest


• Information must be quick and from a single channel, this would avoid the disclosure of false information


• Interdisciplinarity of the scientific community, there must be dialogue between the parties


• Each country should produce and receive knowledge. Of course there will be those who produce only the beginning and who receives only the contrary, but the goal should be to find a balance between the two parties.


• Italy el'ingerenza strong influence of religious power, what is the situation in other countries? What should be the relationship between society knowledge and religious power?


• I believe that there is no certain knowledge, every point of arrival must be the starting point so that the search never stops


• requires only one extra-national organization that mean the relationship between business entity research and states (the model I have in mind is the century of which we spoke Beccari)


• free creativity: we must not think that because we talk about science you can not talk about creativity.


• Be critical of knowledge: we may become, if not ideology


• Thinking about science as a culture in which the citizen needs

(Cecilia Sereni Lucarelli)