Meeting of 12 October in Paris: travel program
- Friday evening departure from Cesena, at 20:13
- Arrival in Bologna, at 21.15
- Change trains and flights from Bologna, 22:15 (10 minutes late)
- Travel at night in the cabin with bunks, arriving in Paris Bercy 09:45 hours
- Entry into the Metro and to call for instructions
Tamer - Purchase tickets and travel by metro to Porte de la Villette where is the "City of Science and Industry"
- Search Tamer within the City. After a riot there Tamer: He takes stock of Francis and takes us off at the bus line and provides us with instructions to arrive at the home of Sophie in which we have to leave your luggage Elena.
- At about 12:00 we arrived at the home of Sophie, Auberville in a peripheral suburb of Paris. We leave the luggage of Elena and we set an appointment for 19:00 in a downtown restaurant.
- Take the subway and we go off at Chatelet, in the heart of Paris, and start a patrol of the area that includes the observation of islands in the middle of the Seine (where among other things, is Notre Dame) and the area surroundings. We find a restaurant for lunch at about 14:45. French food we taste. After lunch we resumed our journey and head to the Pantheon and the Sorbonne university and take this opportunity also to look at a few stores.
- At 19:00 we go in "Le Fresque" where we meet with the group of the project. To expect there are two guys from the Portuguese panel, Bruno (21anni) and Ana (18y.o.). After arriving in succession: Frederique (a girl, organizer of the project) and her roommate, Virginie, Tamer wife, Nina (17 years), the girl on behalf of the German panel and Lionel, the mind of the organization of the project, two boys French Amerie (21anni) and Olivia (16years). During dinner, courtesy, we had the opportunity to make the first knowledge and understand the organization of the boys for the project. Apart from their better organization in the move, it emerged that the Italian group are in more close-knit and homogeneous: in fact, the boys of the other panels are from schools, cities, different regions and have fewer opportunities for mutual involvement. In any case the work done by the various panels seems to be going in that direction.
- Nina spent the night as a guest at the home of Lionel, and the two French boys and the two boys are the Portuguese were guests at the home of Frederique; Elena was hosted at the home of Frank and Sophie's house Tamer and Virginia. All we have moved underground.
- The morning after the meeting has been established in the building project "Petits Debrouillard" located near the "City of Science and Industry" at 10.00.
- Two guys from the panel of Belgium, and Peter Morgan, met us at the meeting which lasted until around 17.30 and was stopped for lunch from 13.30 to 14.45 in an Italian restaurant, where Francis has forced the boys of the other panels to experience the Italian cuisine, with some success. In general, the climate was very positive and has worked hard with great ease.
- At the end of the meeting, Morgan and Nina are shared immediately, we and the other guys we went to visit the "City of Science and Industry" and we had the opportunity to spend a pleasant late afternoon.
- After that, along with Sophie and we went exploring Frederique of one of the most typical of Paris: Montmartre, also known as the artists' quarter. We had the opportunity to enjoy crepes, and other special gauffres French. We took a long walk for these warm and cozy Parisian streets and finally we went to dinner at a restaurant very private, very cozy and the walls papered with drawings, prints, posters and photographs depicting the Vintage-style big city attractions such as the Moulin Rouge. After dinner we continued our walk, we took the subway and we headed to the streets dedicated to the exploration of social life: Sexy Shop, Sexy pub, the "Moulin Rouge", the disco "The Folies de Pigalle." After that we headed to each respective holes and we said goodbye to the other boys, with a slight hint of bitterness. We returned to the accommodation at 23.30 or so.
- Wake up at 6.00 am and by appointment to the Metro stop near the house of Tamer at 7:00 am. From there, after saying goodbye to Sophie, we went to the Gare de Lyon where we took the train to Milan Centrale at 07:42.
- We arrived in Milan at 15.30 and we took the intercity train to Cesena at 16 .. 05. The arrival in Cesena is scheduled at 19.15.
- In the train we have prepared this summary of the stages of the journey and the practical instructions that have been suggested (taxes) during the meeting on Sunday. (Francesco Furno and Elena Rinaldi)
Monday, October 13, 2008
Best Mount And Blade Mode
Keywords
meeting last Friday, October 10, resulting in the following keywords, which likely will cover most of our 20 recommendations. In the meantime, expect the contribution that Francis and Helen certainly lead us after the meeting yesterday!
Here are the keywords:
** = spheres of power (interest)
meeting last Friday, October 10, resulting in the following keywords, which likely will cover most of our 20 recommendations. In the meantime, expect the contribution that Francis and Helen certainly lead us after the meeting yesterday!
Here are the keywords:
Knowledge
Information / dissemination
Communication / language, methods, ways, means
Search
Common sense
Education / Education - News?
Responsibility
Curiosity
Participation
Economics
Policy **
Religion Languages \u200b\u200b** **
Emotions freedom
European Society
Cooperation Dialogue
Need - trust
Science = guarantor of scientific
Critics
Territory
Method
Culture
Scientific Method - Universal
** = spheres of power (interest)
Friday, October 10, 2008
How To Clean Pedestal Sink Pipes
last encounter problems and ideas to create a knowledge society
* In the panels of other nations visited a number of points have arisen in regard to the environment, climate, politics, then you should seek the suggestions on these topics we have faced a lesser way.
We talked mainly of knowledge, scientific research, and democratic society based on science.
* There may be a knowledge society? Knowledge there can be a fair and equitable in all the states? Probably not, that's why you have the risk of a monopoly of knowledge by stronger nations.
* Can a society of knowledge consists of states with its own history, culture and tradition? Must take account of this diversity to create unity.
* Knowledge is closely linked to communication, how communication? Need to create relationships between society and scientific citizenship: the importance the school.
* "The company is the knowledge that the individuals of that society produces." All people should participate in the dissemination of knowledge asttraverso training and basic education. *
citizens must recognize their civic duty as the approach to knowledge scientifically. *
the goal is to create a society of knowledge, based on scienza.In that is how you can do science? Science is common sense applied with rigor, but as common sense? Need to create a unique and universal common sense. *
basic research and applied research: it is important to support research by investing money, each country must be able to do and develop research.
* must keep alive the spirit of science, this is also manitene through criticism but to make us critical Déesse a basic knowledge and basic information.
* You need the need for magazines that deal with science at a fair level of communication and understanding.
* The information often comes from the mass media, whose critical threshold has been lowered significantly in coming to talk about a crisis of mass media.avi 'important that people are properly informed as they need to participate in the formation of this company so you must create a new channel of information, perhaps a single channel x tAll nations. *
science is culture and the citizen Able citizen must become knowledge.
* must free their creativity by taking a more common sense. *
curiosity is the basis of knowledge, it is important to arouse the curiosity of the citizens and especially young people who represent the future of our società .Come? Making them part of the questions about the science but also the environment, politics in order to invite them to participate in this great project (Elena Rinaldi).
* In the panels of other nations visited a number of points have arisen in regard to the environment, climate, politics, then you should seek the suggestions on these topics we have faced a lesser way.
We talked mainly of knowledge, scientific research, and democratic society based on science.
* There may be a knowledge society? Knowledge there can be a fair and equitable in all the states? Probably not, that's why you have the risk of a monopoly of knowledge by stronger nations.
* Can a society of knowledge consists of states with its own history, culture and tradition? Must take account of this diversity to create unity.
* Knowledge is closely linked to communication, how communication? Need to create relationships between society and scientific citizenship: the importance the school.
* "The company is the knowledge that the individuals of that society produces." All people should participate in the dissemination of knowledge asttraverso training and basic education. *
citizens must recognize their civic duty as the approach to knowledge scientifically. *
the goal is to create a society of knowledge, based on scienza.In that is how you can do science? Science is common sense applied with rigor, but as common sense? Need to create a unique and universal common sense. *
basic research and applied research: it is important to support research by investing money, each country must be able to do and develop research.
* must keep alive the spirit of science, this is also manitene through criticism but to make us critical Déesse a basic knowledge and basic information.
* You need the need for magazines that deal with science at a fair level of communication and understanding.
* The information often comes from the mass media, whose critical threshold has been lowered significantly in coming to talk about a crisis of mass media.avi 'important that people are properly informed as they need to participate in the formation of this company so you must create a new channel of information, perhaps a single channel x tAll nations. *
science is culture and the citizen Able citizen must become knowledge.
* must free their creativity by taking a more common sense. *
curiosity is the basis of knowledge, it is important to arouse the curiosity of the citizens and especially young people who represent the future of our società .Come? Making them part of the questions about the science but also the environment, politics in order to invite them to participate in this great project (Elena Rinaldi).
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Putting On Nail Polish
New proposals by Giulia Raggi
"Have a look here and there among the various documents and leaflets, having had the opportunity to read and enjoy the last posts on this blog from my mates and took a course of study that allows me to have a fairly open mind, due to the fact that much importance is given to the humanities, have I found a possible council, or at least an idea, a draft. Here are my thoughts, hoping not to be too trivial
I was able to find that one of the great pillars on which the knowledge society should be based is that of communication. Communication, we are taught this in the early days of our childhood, occurs through a channel, the box. So, how to talk to Europe? How can arrive at an efficient interaction of the individual?
Guys, I am convinced that, somehow, within the formation of a young (and this certainly also affect the level of education of each, leading to an increase in the level) should be added to the study of foreign languages, at least two (excluding your mother tongue). I know that learning two foreign languages \u200b\u200bhas already been entered for years at school, but I think we should do it that they were dealt with more serious themes, debates were organized in language and encourage, through a program of school, communication between young people, via e-mail or paper, since they are the basis of the future. Do not limit yourself to the most basic knowledge of grammatical structures, but to be able to develop and express arguing, their opinion. Without doubt, the English would gain more importance in the sense that is often overlooked by students and judged on how "tricky". Some people are more inclined and less, but if you began teaching in early childhood and studied for a significant number of hours, in addition, the transmission of foreign languages, or teaching, should be carried out by native speakers . What I mean is: why not try to get serious about a common language, spoken and understood by all (a bit 'as he had tried to do in the seventies with Esperanto, but failed).
Another aspect that I would like to dwell is that of knowledge.
We are trying to work towards the creation of a European knowledge society, therefore, first of all, you should just learn this. Knowing not only concepts or theories, but knowing the "other". How can we expect to collaborate with other European citizens if they do not know? So I strongly believe that in the future education of young people at European level, things should be done about the plans for extending cultural nations outside the European Union, because in fact we are a large community, but lack the relationships and This knowledge often generates non-prejudice, xenophobia or racism. For cultural expansion I mean cultural study, but also geographical and historical, for example, countries such as France, Germany, Spain and all the others. However
however, to build on this, it would be good there was a return, by all, the so-called values: respect first of all.
Unless we learn to respect us, we could learn and apply all the concepts we want, but you will never have a proper spirit of cooperation, which can arise due to the European knowledge society.
very latest thing, which is more of a challenge: Do not think that the European Parliament is legislating and a little too proactive? (This is a question I sort, but on which I still think about it! But I think that might be a possible draft.)
Hoping not to have bored you and hoping you got some ideas ...
Giulia
"Have a look here and there among the various documents and leaflets, having had the opportunity to read and enjoy the last posts on this blog from my mates and took a course of study that allows me to have a fairly open mind, due to the fact that much importance is given to the humanities, have I found a possible council, or at least an idea, a draft. Here are my thoughts, hoping not to be too trivial
I was able to find that one of the great pillars on which the knowledge society should be based is that of communication. Communication, we are taught this in the early days of our childhood, occurs through a channel, the box. So, how to talk to Europe? How can arrive at an efficient interaction of the individual?
Guys, I am convinced that, somehow, within the formation of a young (and this certainly also affect the level of education of each, leading to an increase in the level) should be added to the study of foreign languages, at least two (excluding your mother tongue). I know that learning two foreign languages \u200b\u200bhas already been entered for years at school, but I think we should do it that they were dealt with more serious themes, debates were organized in language and encourage, through a program of school, communication between young people, via e-mail or paper, since they are the basis of the future. Do not limit yourself to the most basic knowledge of grammatical structures, but to be able to develop and express arguing, their opinion. Without doubt, the English would gain more importance in the sense that is often overlooked by students and judged on how "tricky". Some people are more inclined and less, but if you began teaching in early childhood and studied for a significant number of hours, in addition, the transmission of foreign languages, or teaching, should be carried out by native speakers . What I mean is: why not try to get serious about a common language, spoken and understood by all (a bit 'as he had tried to do in the seventies with Esperanto, but failed).
Another aspect that I would like to dwell is that of knowledge.
We are trying to work towards the creation of a European knowledge society, therefore, first of all, you should just learn this. Knowing not only concepts or theories, but knowing the "other". How can we expect to collaborate with other European citizens if they do not know? So I strongly believe that in the future education of young people at European level, things should be done about the plans for extending cultural nations outside the European Union, because in fact we are a large community, but lack the relationships and This knowledge often generates non-prejudice, xenophobia or racism. For cultural expansion I mean cultural study, but also geographical and historical, for example, countries such as France, Germany, Spain and all the others. However
however, to build on this, it would be good there was a return, by all, the so-called values: respect first of all.
Unless we learn to respect us, we could learn and apply all the concepts we want, but you will never have a proper spirit of cooperation, which can arise due to the European knowledge society.
very latest thing, which is more of a challenge: Do not think that the European Parliament is legislating and a little too proactive? (This is a question I sort, but on which I still think about it! But I think that might be a possible draft.)
Hoping not to have bored you and hoping you got some ideas ...
Giulia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)